Yahoo India Web Search

Search results

  1. An agreement to live separate and apart, if alleged and proved, empowers the Court to refuse a decree for restitution of conjugal rights, where to pronounce a decree would be to treat one of the Spouses as deserting the other without reasonable cause, contrary to the truth of the case.

  2. PETITIONER: RAJAMMAL. Vs. RESPONDENT: STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ANOTHER. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 14/12/1998. BENCH: K.T. THOMAS, D.P.WADHWA, & SYED SHAH MOHAMMED QUADRI. ACT: HEADNOTE: JUDGMENT: -------- THOMAS, J. --------- Leave granted.

  3. Feb 5, 2008 · Facts. The appellant filed W.P No. 22366 of 1993, seeking a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to take appropriate action against the culprits involved in her husband's custodial death and to pay fair and adequate damages and compensation of Rs. 5 lakhs to the family of the deceased.

  4. Preview text. Madras High Court A. Thirumal Naidu vs Rajammal Alias Rajalakshmi on 5 January, 1967 Equivalent citations: (1967) 2 MLJ 484 Author: A Alagiriswami JUDGMENT A. Alagiriswami, J. The question that arises in this case does not so far appear to have come up for decision before any Court.

  5. The Supreme Court held that the unexplained delay from 9-2-1998 to 14-2-1998 in considering Smt. Rajammal's representation had vitiated her further detention. As a result, the Court allowed the appeal, set aside the impugned judgment, and disallowed her further detention under the Tamil Nadu Act.

  6. Thirumal Naidu v. Rajammal Alias Rajalakshmi6 In this case, the court held that a prenuptial agreement to live separately in the future will also go against the public policy. The court observed that an agreement before or at the time of marriage controlling the rights of the parties which the laws confers upon them after the marriage would make

  7. Dec 14, 1998 · Smt. Rajammal, a thirty two year old is kept under detention dubbing her as a "bootlegger", as per the detention order passed under Section 3(1) of the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, drug Offenders, Forest Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders and Slum Grabbers Act, 1982 (Tamil Nadu Act 14/1982 ...

  8. Dec 14, 1998 · RAJAMMAL. Vs. RESPONDENT: STATE OF TAMIL NADU AND ANOTHER. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 14/12/1998. BENCH: K.T. THOMAS, D.P.WADHWA, & SYED SHAH MOHAMMED QUADRI. ACT: HEADNOTE: JUDGMENT: -------- THOMAS, J. --------- Leave granted. Smt. Rajammal, a thirty two year old is kept under. detention dubbing her as a "bootlegger", as per the.

  9. Aug 21, 2021 · In 1967, the Madras High Court in Thirumal Naidu v. Rajammal Alias Rajalakshmi refused to enforce a pre-nuptial agreement in which the couples agreed prior to the marriage to live apart.

  10. M. V. Rajamma (10 March 1918 – 23 April 1999) was an Indian actress, producer and playback singer of films mostly in Kannada, Tamil and Telugu languages from the 1930s through 1970s.