Search results
4 days ago · Statement on the Supreme Court’s Ruling in Moody v. NetChoice. July 1, 2024 · by Eric Goldman · in Content Regulation. A couple of years ago, Florida and Texas passed “social media censorship” laws. The laws were not subtle–the bill titles literally told the world that the legislatures were censoring social media.
- About the Bloggers - Technology & Marketing Law Blog
About Eric Goldman: Eric Goldman is Associate Dean for...
- Justice Thomas Hates on Section 230. Again.–Doe v. Snap
Eric responds: It’s not just the “platforms’ world.” It’s...
- About the Bloggers - Technology & Marketing Law Blog
3 days ago · Eric responds: It’s not just the “platforms’ world.” It’s the law of the United States. Justice Thomas restates how Congress added Section 230 to the Constitutional protections in the First Amendment.
4 days ago · While the justices ordered a second look at the case by lower courts, tech companies have reason to celebrate the ruling, according to Eric Goldman, a professor at Santa Clara University School of ...
3 days ago · The more emojis and emoticons are used in communications, the more they appear in courtroom litigation, says Eric Goldman, associate dean of research and co-director of Santa Clara University...
4 days ago · “It is likely that large portions, if not all, of the Florida and Texas social media censorship laws will ultimately fail,” Eric Goldman, a professor at the Santa Clara University School of ...
4 days ago · The court’s procedural ruling means that the legal battle is far from over, said Eric Goldman, a law professor at Santa Clara University focused on internet law.
4 days ago · Professor Eric Goldman from Santa Clara University School of Law said the ruling is a win for tech companies. The court's decision supports the idea that social media companies have a First Amendment right to moderate content on their platforms.
