Search results
It was assumed by the judgment that the majority of the Court in Gopalan's case held that Article 22 being a complete code relating to preventive detention the validity of an order of detention must be determined directly according to the terms within the four corners of that Article.
Why was the judgement in the Maneka Gandhi case important? Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India in which the Court significantly expanded the interpretation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India.
Feb 21, 2024 · In the Maneka Gandhi case, the judgment delivered by J. Bhagwati discusses the applicability of principles of natural justice on administrative action. He says that since the principles of natural justice seek to establish fairness in any process, it must be applicable on both quasi-judicial and administrative functions.
May 3, 2020 · Case title: Maneka Gandhi v Union of India (1978) Court: Supreme Court of India. Bench: M.Hameedullah , Y.V.Chandrachud, P.N. Bhagwati, V.R. Krishna Iyer & N.L. Untwalia, S.M. Fazalal, & P.S. Kailasam. (7 judge bench) Petitioner: Maneka Gandhi. Respondent: Union of India. Citation: 1978 AIR 597, 1978 SCR (2) 621. Facts of the case
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, AIR 1978 SC 597, was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India in which the Court significantly expanded the interpretation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India. It overruled A. K. Gopalan v.
Jun 1, 2020 · Judgment. This milestone judgment went ahead 25th January 1978 and changed the scene of the Constitution of India. This judgment extended the extent of Article 21 exponentially and this judgment genuinely and truly made India a government assistance state as guaranteed in the Preamble.
Petitioner: Maneka Gandhi. Disposal Nature: Petition Disposed Off. Neutral Citation: 1978 INSC 16. Judgment Delivered by: Honble Mr. Justice M. Hameedullah Beg,Honble Mr. Justice P.N. Bhagwati,Hon'ble Mr. Justice P.S. Kailasam,Hon'ble Mr. Justice V.R. Krishna Iyer,Honble Mr. Justice Y.V. Chandrachud. Respondent:
Apr 13, 2024 · Menaka Gandhi challenged the impounding of her passport in the Supreme Court, arguing that it violated her fundamental rights under Articles 14 (equality before law), 21 (right to life and personal liberty), and 19 (freedom of movement) of the Indian Constitution.
Aug 30, 2018 · The Maneka Gandhi judgment was a balanced judgment and is one of the best judgments that Indian Supreme Court has ever given. The judgment’s greatest feature was the interlinking it established between the provisions of Article 14, 19 & 21.
This case analysis attempts to analyse the judgement of the Supreme Court in the historical decision of Maneka Gandhi v Union of India reported in AIR 1978 SC 597 which expanded the scope of Article 21 of the Constitution and changed the face of Indian polity and law.
