Search results
1 day ago · The Delhi High Court, while upholding the right to travel abroad, cited the case of (Maneka Gandhi v UOI) and said that a fundamental right to travel cannot be curtailed merely because a company has defaulted on a loan
5 days ago · C. Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978) This case broadened the scope of the right to personal liberty under Article 21. The petitioner, Maneka Gandhi, challenged the impounding of her passport by the government.
3 days ago · The court relied upon the judgments titled Maneka Gandhi vs. Union of India and Anr., Erusian Equipment & Chemicals Lts. V. State of W.B., Nasir Ahmad Vs. Custodian General, Evacuee Property, Gorkha Security Services v. State, and UMC Technologies Private Limited Vs. Food Corporation of India & Anr.
4 days ago · Example: In Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978), the Supreme Court broadened the interpretation of the right to life, emphasizing its substantive aspects. Awareness and Mobilization: Growing public awareness about rights and legal entitlements has led to a surge in PILs. Example: The case of People’s Union for Civil Liberties v.
3 days ago · The argument was rejected by the majority in AK Gopalan, subsequent decisions of the Court in RC Cooper and Maneka Gandhi wholeheartedly endorsed the idea that fundamental rights are not ...
2 days ago · Rulings such as Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India , which held that any procedure that deprives a person of life or liberty must be “right, just and fair” and not “arbitrary, fanciful or oppressive.”, have further reinforced and expanded on this principle.
People also ask
Who is the 'tie-breaker' judge in Kunal Kamra v Union of India?
Can a Canadian jurisprudence be applied in India?
Why did justice Gokhale disagree with Justice Devadasan?
Why did Justice Chandurkar reject rule 3(1)(b)(v)?
2 days ago · Yes, some cases, such as Kesavananada Bharati vs. State of Kerala, Maneka Gandhi vs Union of India, and Vishakha vs. State of Rajasthan, are quickly asked to be landmark judgements.
