Search results
23 hours ago · full text of the judgment/order of gujarat high court [1] By these petitions, the petitioner has challenged the orders passed by the Gujarat Value Added Tax Tribunal at Ahmedabad (for short, “the Tribunal”) in Revision Applications Nos.28 and 29 of 2021.
12 hours ago · The Gujarat High Court on Thursday (October 3) refused to grant status quo in respect of alleged demolition of Muslim places of worship including mosques and graves, which was carried out by the ...
3 days ago · The High Court meticulously reassessed the evidence, particularly focusing on the consistency of Sumitraben’s statements. While the original trial court had dismissed the dying declaration for lacking a doctor’s endorsement, the High Court ruled that the declaration could not be discarded solely for that reason.
3 days ago · Gujarat High Court Parmar Mahendrabhai Shankarbhai vs State Of Gujarat on 30 September, 2024 Author: Biren Vaishnav Bench: Biren Vaishnav NEUTRAL CITATION C/FA/3107/2024 CAV JUDGMENT DATED: 30/09/2024 undefined IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 3107 of 2024 With CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR STAY) NO. 1 of 2024 In R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 3107 of 2024 FOR APPROVAL AND SIGNATURE: HONOURABLE MR.
5 days ago · In the said case, the petitioner, apprehending arrest in a case under Section 498A of the IPC and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961, prayed for anticipatory bail before the Supreme Court, having failed to obtain the same from the High Court.
3 days ago · The Gujarat High Court while relying upon the dying declaration, reversed the acquittal of a husband who was accused of committing abetment of suicide of his wife in the year 1992. The Court was deciding a criminal appeal filed by the State against the judgment of the Trial Court by which the accused was acquitted for the offence punishable under Sections 498(A), 306, and 504 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC).
23 hours ago · Chief Justice DY Chandrachud noted that the Gujarat High Court's ruling in ITO Surat, the Rajeev Bansal judgment by Allahabad HC, the Siemens vs DCIT ruling by Bombay HC, and other decisions were overruled. This decision will have broad implications, particularly for the 90,000 taxpayers affected by the reassessment notices.
