Search results
1 day ago · It noted that Section 195(b)(1) of the CrPC restricts courts from taking cognizance of offences under Sections 193 to 196, 199, 200, 205-211 unless a written complaint is made by the court or an authorized officer. Section 340 details the procedures for such prosecutions. The bench outlined several principles for initiating perjury proceedings: 1.
3 days ago · It noted Section 195(b)(1) of CrPC provided that no court should take cognisance of an offence committed under Sections 193 to 196, 199, 200, 205-211; except on the complaint in writing of the court or by an officer of the court, duly authorised. Section 340 mentioned the procedure in respect of the prosecution as delineated under Section 195.
3 days ago · The case initially stemmed from an application filed by the applicant under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) for bail concerning multiple charges, including forgery and fraud.
2 days ago · James Kunjwal Vs. State of Uttarakhand Anr. [Criminal Appeal No._ of 2024 arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 9783/2023] Sanjay Karol, J. 1. Leave Granted. 2. Impugned in the present appeal is the final order dated 1st October 2022, passed by the High Court of Uttarakhand at Nainital in Bail Cancellation Application No.24/2022, whereby, although the ...
4 days ago · To cater to the educational needs of the children of transferable Central Government employees including Defence and Para-Military personnel by providing a common programme of education. To pursue excellence and set the pace in the field of school education.
3 days ago · Earlier, the special court had rejected the application filed by Gokhale under Section 309 of the CrPC for keeping the proceedings under PMLA in abeyance till the case of scheduled offence registered against him is decided by the court, the ED said.
3 days ago · (crpc 3.700(a)(2).) A lawyer violates his or her ethical mandate by abandoning a client ( Pineda v. State Bar (1989) 49 Cal.3d 753, 758 759), or by withdrawing at a critical point and thereby prejudicing the clients case.
