Search results
Subafilms, Ltd. ("Subafilms") and the Hearst Corporation ("Hearst") sued United Artists Corporation ("UA"), MGM-Pathe Communications Co. ("MGM/UA"), MGM/UA Home Video, Inc., Warner Bros., Inc., and Warner Home Video, Inc. (collectively "the Distributors") for copyright infringement under 17 U.S.C. § 101 et seq., breach of contract, and related state law claims. Defendants counterclaimed for breach of contract, tortious interference with contract, and fraud. The district court found in ...
This case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this circuit's opinion in Subafilms, Ltd. v. MGM-Pathe Communications Co., 24 F.3d 1088 (9th Cir. 1994) (en banc).
Jul 26, 1994 · Get free access to the complete judgment in SUBAFILMS, LTD. v. MGM-PATHE COMMUNICATIONS CO on CaseMine.
Get free access to the complete judgment in SUBAFILMS, LTD. v. MGM-PATHE COMMUNICATIONS on CaseMine.
Feb 24, 1994 · SUBAFILMS, LTD.; The Hearst Corp., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MGM-PATHE COMMUNICATIONS CO., fka MGM/UA Communications Co. and as United Artists Corporation; MGM/UA Home Video, Inc.; Warner Home Video, Inc.; Warner Bros. Inc.; United Artists Corporation, Defendants-Appellees.
Title Subafilms, Ltd. v. MGM-Pathe Communications Co.: Should Infringing Acts Authorized within the United States but Committed Extraterritorially Constitute a Valid ...
We are not allowed to display external PDFs yet. You will be redirected to the full text document in the repository in a few seconds, if not click here.
