Search results
Menaka Guruswamy (born 27 November 1974) is a Senior Advocate at the Supreme Court of India. She was the B.R. Ambedkar Research Scholar and Lecturer at Columbia Law School, New York from 2017 to 2019. [2]
Experience: Supreme Court of India · Location: South Delhi · 500+ connections on LinkedIn. View Menaka Guruswamy’s profile on LinkedIn, a professional community of 1 billion members.
Mar 6, 2019 · As one of the lawyers who argued against Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, she was instrumental in the scrapping of the law that made homosexuality a crime. Guruswamy had appeared on behalf...
Follow Menaka Guruswamy, a senior advocate at the Supreme Court of India and a global leader in human rights law, on Twitter. Get updates on her latest cases, publications, and insights on constitutional and social justice issues.
Menaka Guruswamy and Arundhati Katju, who won a landmark LGBTQ rights case in India, are two of the most influential people in 2019, Priyanka Chopra writes.
Dec 23, 2022 · The judge spoke eloquently on changing morality, reforming laws and constitutional morality in India, from the court’s decision in Navtej Singh Johar on gay rights to honour killings, as young couples crossed caste fault lines and found love in each other.
Jul 20, 2019 · India saw a new ray of hope, thanks to the leading ladies - advocates Menaka Guruswamy (44) and Arundhati Katju (36) - who argued against the discrimination and violence that the LGBTQ community faced every day.
Dr Guruswamy is amicus curiae appointed by the Supreme Court in a case concerning 1528 alleged extra-judicial killings by security personnel. In her private law practice she litigates in the areas of civil law, commercial law and white collar crime.
Dr Guruswamy is amicus curiae appointed by the Supreme Court in a case concerning 1528 alleged extra-judicial killings by security personnel. In her private law practice she litigates in the areas of civil law, commercial law and white collar crime.
Oct 31, 2018 · The historic Sept. 6, 2018 decision was a stunning reversal for a court that just five years earlier ruled against LGBT Indians, and stories of fear and discrimination from individual petitioners is what seemed to turn the tide, said Menaka Guruswamy.
