Search results
K. Rajah Aiyar, Advocate-General of Madras (C. R. Pattabi Raman and R. Ganapathi, with him) lot the State of Madras. M.C. Setalvad, Attorney-General for India (Jindralal, with him) for the Union of India.
Apr 22, 2022 · In A.K. Gopalan vs the State of Madras, the Supreme Court interpreted the meaning of Article 21 and restricted it by diminishing its real value and gave the decision in favour of the government. However, among the 6 judges’ bench, only Justice Fazl Ali was not favouring this judgment.
Jun 17, 2024 · Introduction. Details of the case. Facts of AK Gopalan vs. State of Madras (1950) Issues raised. Arguments of the parties. Petitioner. Respondent. Relevant laws and provisions. Constitutional provisions. Article 19. Article 21. Article 32. Statutory provisions. Section 12 of the Preventive Detention Act, 1950.
Oct 3, 2021 · A K Gopalan vs State of Madras [1] is a landmark case for the Indian judiciary. It is referred to as a landmark case as well as the first case where the Indian Supreme Court dealt with various articles enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution as well as gives certain principles.
A.K. Gopalan v. State of Madras, AIR 1950 SC 27, was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India in which the Court ruled that Article 21 of the Constitution did not require Indian courts to apply a due process of law standard.
May 27, 2020 · FACTS OF A. K. GOPALAN V. STATE OF MADRAS. In A. K. Gopalan v. State of Madras, A.K. Gopalan was a communist leader who had been imprisoned by the state of Madras in 1947 under convictions of ordinary criminal law, however those convictions were set aside.
According to him, article 22 is a complete code. I am unable to accept that contention. It is obvious that in respect of arrest and detention article 22 (1) and (2) provide safeguards.
View Complete document. A.K. Gopalan vs The State Of Madras.Union Of India: ... on 19 May, 1950. Showing the contexts in which personal liberty appears in the document. Change context size Current. (g) to all citizens of India.
Jul 31, 2022 · A.K. Gopalan vs The State of Madras. Bench: Kania, Hiralal J. (Cj) Citation: 1950 AIR 27. Facts: Mr. Gopalan was detained by the Madras Government in Madras jail. While in detention the Madras Government served him with Section 3 (1) of Preventive Detention Act (P.D.A.). No reasons were accorded for the detention.
May 9, 2022 · In the matter of A K Gopalan vs. State of Madras, AIR SC 27, the petition was made by AK Gopalan under Article 32(1) of the Constitution of India. A writ of habeas corpus was filed against his detention under the Preventive Detention Act, 1950.
