Yahoo India Web Search

Search results

  1. ACP Kumar also denied that Prasad was killed due to a family dispute or robbery. “Our teams are investigating the case to ascertain the motive behind the murder,” he added.

  2. 1 day ago · "Lalu Prasad and his family used their influence and official positions to derive personal benefits, masking the illicit transactions through a series of complex financial manoeuvres and entities.

  3. Aug 16, 2021 · Bench: Subramonium Prasad. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + CRL.M.C. 1524/2021. Date of decision: AUGUST 16th, 2021. IN THE MATTER OF: VIMLESH AGNIHOTRI & ORS ..... Petitioners. Through Mr. Sonu Kumar, Advocate. versus.

  4. A day after 67-year-old retired defence official Hari Prasad was shot dead while seated on a park bench near his home in Greater Noida West, his family members said his wallet and gold ring were...

  5. to kill their family. 3.4 It seems that even prior to the alleged occurrences, there were disputes between the parties in 2006. A mutual settlement took place on 6.02.2006 by which Respondent No. 2 agreed to pay a penalty of Rs. 3,000/­ to the Appellant No. 1.

  6. anyone about the incident then all his family members will be eliminated. It is further alleged that the accused persons forcibly got the signatures of the Complainant and his brother on a blank stamp paper and after being robbed of their money the Complainant and his brother quietly returned home. 3. It is respectfully submitted that the alleged

  7. People also ask

  8. The Petitioner submits that a matrimonial dispute is sought to be given a criminal colour at the instance of the Respondent. The allegations against the petitioner is unsustainable in law and