Yahoo India Web Search

Search results

  1. Jul 10, 2017 · One of the major reasons for the political differences between Dr Rajendra Prasad and Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru was the attitude of both of them towards the significance of religion in the society. Nehru favoured modern socialism, he believed that attitude towards religion was the main reason for India's situation.

  2. Jul 15, 2012 · The outcome of a clash between our first President Dr Rajendra Prasad and our first Prime Minister Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru perhaps shaped our polity which recognises the supremacy of Parliament.

    • India, North
  3. Feb 28, 1987 · Clash between President Dr Prasad and PM Nehru over Hindu Code Bill most serious. Presidents and prime ministers have crossed swords with each other in the past too. But none of these skirmishes was as serious as the one between the first President, Dr Rajendra Prasad, and the first prime minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, over the Hindu Code Bill.

    • Cover Story
  4. Feb 28, 2022 · Both Nehru and Rajendra Prasad were given the prestigious jobs of leading the country after its independence. While they worked together harmoniously, there were significant ideological differences between them.

    • 1.2 The dominant voices
    • “That is very good, Sir – bold words, noble words”
    • 3. Defining Rights
    • “The British element is gone, but they have left the mischief behind”
    • “There cannot be any divided loyalty”
    • 3.2 “We will need much more than this Resolution”
    • “The real minorities are the masses of this country”
    • 3.3 “We were suppressed for thousands of years”
    • “We want removal of our social disabilities”
    • We have never asked for privileges
    • 4. The Powers of the State
    • 4.1 “The centre is likely to break”
    • 4.2 “What we want today is a strong Government”
    • 5. The Language of the Nation
    • 5.1 A plea for Hindi
    • 5.2 The fear of domination
    • Timeline
    • ANSWER IN 100-150 WORDS
    • You could visit:

    The Constituent Assembly had 300 members. Of these, six members played particularly important roles. Three were representatives of the Congress, namely, Jawaharlal Nehru, Vallabh Bhai Patel and Rajendra Prasad. It was Nehru who moved the crucial “Objectives Resolution”, as well as the resolution proposing that the National Flag of India be a “horiz...

    Somnath Lahiri said: Well, Sir, I must congratulate Pandit Nehru for the fine expression he gave to the spirit of the Indian people when he said that no imposition from the British will be accepted by the Indian people. Imposition would be resented and objected to, he said, and he added that if need be we will walk the valley of struggle. That is v...

    How were the rights of individual citizens to be defined? Were the oppressed groups to have any special rights? What rights would minorities have? Who, in fact, could be defined as a minority? As the debate on the floor of the Constituent Assembly unfolded, it was clear that there were no collectively shared answers to any of these questions. The a...

    Sardar Vallabh Bhai Patel said: It is no use saying that we ask for separate electorates, because it is good for us. We have heard it long enough. We have heard it for years, and as a result of this agitation we are now a separate nation ... Can you show me one free country where there are separate electorates? If so, I shall be prepared to accept ...

    Govind Ballabh Pant argued that in order to become loyal citizens people had to stop focusing only on the community and the self: For the success of democracy one must train himself in the art of self-discipline. In democracies one should care less for himself and more for others. There cannot be any divided loyalty. All loyalties must exclusively ...

    While welcoming the Objectives Resolution, N.G. Ranga, a socialist who had been a leader of the peasant movement, urged that the term minorities be interpreted in economic terms. The real minorities for Ranga were the poor and the downtrodden. He welcomed the legal rights the Constitution was granting to each individual but pointed to its limits. I...

    Welcoming the Objectives Resolution introduced by Jawaharlal Nehru, N.G. Ranga said: Sir, there is a lot of talk about minorities. Who are the real minorities? Not the Hindus in the so-called Pakistan provinces, not the Sikhs, not even the Muslims. No, the real minorities are the masses of this country. These people are so depressed and oppressed a...

    How were the rights of the Depressed Castes to be defined by the Constitution? During the national movement Ambedkar had demanded separate electorates for the Depressed Castes, and Mahatma Gandhi had opposed it, arguing that this would permanently segregate them from the rest of society. How could the Constituent Assembly resolve this opposition? W...

    Dakshayani Velayudhan from Madras, argued: What we want is not all kinds of safeguards. It is the moral safeguard which gives protection to the underdogs of this country ... I refuse to believe that seventy million Harijans are to be considered as a minority ... what we want is the ... immediate removal of our social disabilities.’ CAD, VOL.I We we...

    Hansa Mehta of Bombay demanded justice for women, not reserved seats, or separate electorates. We have never asked for privileges. What we have asked for is social justice, economic justice, and political justice. We have asked for that equality which alone can be the basis of mutual respect and understanding, without which real cooperation is not ...

    One of the topics most vigorously debated in the Constituent Assembly was the respective rights of the Central Government and the states. Among those arguing for a strong Centre was Jawaharlal Nehru. As he put it in a letter to the President of the Constituent Assembly, “Now that partition is a settled fact, ... it would be injurious to the interes...

    The rights of the states were most eloquently defended by K. Santhanam from Madras. A reallocation of powers was necessary, he felt, to strengthen not only the states but also the Centre. “There is almost an obsession that by adding all kinds of powers to the Centre we can make it strong.” This was a misconception, said Santhanam. If the Centre wa...

    The argument for greater power to the provinces provoked a strong reaction in the Assembly. The need for a strong centre had been underlined on numerous occasions since the Constituent Assembly had begun its sessions. Ambedkar had declared that he wanted “a strong and united Centre (hear, hear) much stronger than the Centre we had created under th...

    How could the nation be forged when people in different regions spoke different languages, each associated with its own cultural heritage? How could people listen to each other, or connect with each other, if they did not know each other’s language? Within the Constituent Assembly, the language issue was debated over many months, and often generate...

    In one of the earliest sessions of the Constituent Assembly, R. V. Dhulekar, a Congressman from the United Provinces, made an aggressive plea that Hindi be used as the language of constitution-making. When told that not everyone in the Assembly knew the language, Dhulekar retorted: “People who are present in this House to fashion a constitution for...

    A day after Dhulekar spoke, Shrimati G. Durgabai from Madras explained her worries about the way the discussion was developing: Mr President, the question of national language for India which was an almost agreed proposition until recently has suddenly become a highly controversial issue. Whether rightly or wrongly, the people of non-Hindi-speaking...

    Labour Government comes into power in Britain General Elections in India Cabinet Mission announces its constitutional scheme Muslim League accepts Cabinet Mission’s constitutional scheme Cabinet Mission presents scheme for the formation of an Interim Government at the Centre Muslim League announces Direct Action Day Congress forms Interim Governmen...

    What were the ideals expressed in the Objectives Resolution? How was the term minority defined by different groups? What were the arguments in favour of greater power to the provinces? Why did Mahatma Gandhi think Hindustani should be the national language?

    parliamentofindia.nic.in/ls/ debates/debates.htm (for a digitalised version of the Constituent Assembly Debates) Write a short essay

  5. Aug 5, 2020 · Jawaharlal Nehru, had expressed strong objection to the presence of president Rajendra Prasad at the event, which he believed went against his idea of an India in which state and religion were to be separated.

  6. People also ask

  7. The fact is that Jawaharlal was a rationalist and a humanist, and did not view cultural conflict in twentieth-century India in the same way as the leaders of communal parties did. The real struggle seemed to him not between Hindu and Muslim cultures, but between these two cultures and the conquering scientific culture of modern civilization.