Yahoo India Web Search

Search results

  1. Thereafter on the complaint of respondent no.3, vigilance enquiry was conducted by ACP (vigilance). ACP (Vigilance) submitted a report dated 6.12.2006 and exonerated the petitioner.

  2. 8. Action on Investigation Report 41 9. Consultation with Central Vigilance Commission 42-56 10. Suspension 57-71 11. Minor Penalty Proceedings 72-75 12. Drafting and Issue of Charge Sheet 76-87 13. Appointment of Inquiring Authority and Presenting Officer 88-91 14. Functions of Inquiry Officer 92-100 15.

    • 4MB
    • 242
  3. Nov 29, 2020 · Whether the nature of punishment, further, whenever the rules require an inquiry to be held, for inflicting the punishment in question, the delinquent employee should have the benefit of the report of the Inquiry Officer before the disciplinary authority records its findings on the charges levelled against him.

    • Introduction
    • Central Vigilance Commission
    • Main Issues and Controversies
    • Cases
    • Conclusion
    • References

    “There can be no faith in government if our highest offices are excused from scrutiny — they should be setting the example of transparency” – Edward Snowden The misuse of powers by the bureaucrats, politicians, government officials and public servants to meet their personal ends can be traced back to the British regime. Prior to 1947, democracy was...

    Central Vigilance Commission is an apex autonomous institution, conferred with the power to review and monitor the governmental activities to ensure a corruption-free environment. The authority has been accorded with a statutory status in 2003 by the Central Vigilance Commission Act.

    Over the years, the office of the Chief Vigilance Officers and the Commission has encountered issues concerning transparency and independence from the executive in the exercise of its powers.

    Case of Sumit Kumar Banerjee v. State of West Bengal

    In the case of Sumit Kumar v. State of West Bengal, 1980 AIR 1170, charges were framed by the Enquiry Officer against the appellant, who was a member of Indian Administrative Services. The report was consulted with the State Vigilance Commission. Upon considerations, the Disciplinary Authority( State Government), imposed punishments on the appellant. In an appeal to the Supreme Court, the appellant contended that the ultimate findings and the conviction cannot be based on reports of the Enqui...

    A.R. Antulay’s case

    In the case of R. S. Nayak vs. A. R. Antulay, 1984 AIR 684, the appellant filed a complaint approved by the sanction of the Governor, against the then Chief Minister of Maharashtra( respondent ). The complaints alleged the respondent to be guilty of misallocation of public funds and corruption. However, the respondent resigned on the same date and continued to serve as an MLA. The respondent contended that a sanction as provided under Section 6of the PCA, 1947 is necessary to proceed against...

    The corruption measures and the attempt of the Central Government to build transparency by establishing a centralised, independent apex institution have witnessed evolutions over time. From an executive organ, established by a governmental resolution to a statutory authority by the virtue of CVC Act, 2003, the powers conferred upon it have expanded...

  4. The Central Vigilance Commission has brought out Vigilance Manuals comprising of compilation of various rules, instructions and guidelines on vigilance administration from time to time.

  5. Jan 17, 2017 · Tribunal found that though Inquiry Officer was appointed since inquiry for major penalty was initiated by departmental authority after placing respondent no. 1 under suspension but no oral inquiry was conducted and after receiving reply from concerned employee Inquiry officer submitted report and thereafter order of punishment was passed, said ...

  6. People also ask

  7. Feb 3, 2024 · 07/09/00. Powers and Functions of the Central vigilance Commission in relation to autonomous bodies 'other than the public sector undertakings' under various Ministries/Departments. View. 000/VGL/18. 000/VGL/18. 23/05/0. Schedule of time limits in conducting investigations and departmental inquiries. View.