Search results
- The case of Sajjan Singh vs State of Rajasthan was heard by the Supreme Court of India in 1965. The case involved a challenge to the validity of the Constitution (26 th Amendment) Act, which abolished the princely privileges and privy purses of the rulers of the former princely states.
legalvidhiya.com/sajjan-singh-vs-state-of-rajasthan-air-1965-sc-845/
People also ask
What is Sajjan Singh v State of Rajasthan?
What is Sajjan Singh case?
Who were the judges in Sajjan Singh vs State of Rajasthan?
Who wrote the article in Sajjan Singh v State of Rajasthan?
What were the laws in Sajjan Singh v Rajasthan?
Was Article 368 misused in Sajjan Singh v State of Rajasthan?
May 11, 2023 · The Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the 26th Amendment Act that abolished the princely privileges and privy purses of the former rulers in India. The judgment enhanced the supremacy of the Constitution, the fundamental rights, and the democratic ideals of equality and non-discrimination.
A landmark judgment on the validity of the Constitution (Seventeenth Amendment) Act, 1964, which added 44 Acts to the Ninth Schedule to protect them from judicial review. The Court held that the Act was valid and saved the agrarian reform legislation of several States.
Apr 18, 2024 · A detailed analysis of the landmark judgement in Sajjan Singh v. State of Rajasthan (1964), which dealt with the power of Parliament to amend the Constitution and the doctrine of basic structure. The article covers the facts, issues, arguments, judgement, precedents and after-effects of the case.
Nov 7, 2022 · A case analysis of the Supreme Court judgment that upheld the amendment of fundamental rights through the Seventeenth Amendment Act, 1964. The dissenting opinion of Justice M. Hidayatullah laid the foundation for the Basic Structure Doctrine and the Kesavananda Bharati Case.
Jul 21, 2023 · A landmark case that defined the basic structure of the Indian Constitution and the scope of Article 368. The Supreme Court held that the Constitution (Seventeenth Amendment) Act, which amended the fundamental rights, was valid and did not require the special procedure of the proviso to Article 368.
Aug 26, 2022 · A case summary of the 1954 SC judgment that upheld the power of Parliament to amend the Constitution, including the fundamental rights, under Article 368. The case also discussed the concept of basic structure of the Constitution and the scope of judicial review.
Apr 13, 2023 · The case of Sajjan Singh vs State of Rajasthan was heard by the Supreme Court of India in 1965. The case involved a challenge to the validity of the Constitution (26 th Amendment) Act, which abolished the princely privileges and privy purses of the rulers of the former princely states.
