Search results
- Dictionarymove/muːv/
verb
- 1. go in a specified direction or manner; change position: "she moved to the door" Similar Opposite
- 2. make progress; develop in a particular manner or direction: "aircraft design had moved forward a long way" Similar Opposite
noun
- 1. a change of place, position, or state: "she made a sudden move towards me" Similar
Powered by Oxford Dictionaries
Aug 17, 2013 · [ Note: The copy/move constructor is implicitly defined even if the implementation elided its odr-use (3.2, 12.2). —end note ][...] and paragraph 15 which says: The implicitly-defined copy/move constructor for a non-union class X performs a memberwise copy/move of its bases and members. [ Note: brace-or-equal-initializers of non-static data ...
Jun 24, 2010 · The move constructor will transfer ownership from the temporary to c. Again, this is exactly what we wanted. The move constructor transfers ownership of a managed resource into the current object. Move assignment operators. The last missing piece is the move assignment operator.
Aug 10, 2013 · 18. The proper generic way is to move-construct each member, but that's what the defauted version does anyway: T(T && rhs) : a(std::move(rhs.a)) , b(std::move(rhs.b)) { } As a rough rule, you should use the default definition if this is all you need, and you should write an explicit move constructor if you're doing something that expli ...
Aug 5, 2010 · A: std::move() is a function from the C++ Standard Library for casting to a rvalue reference. Simplisticly std::move(t) is equivalent to: static_cast<T&&>(t); An rvalue is a temporary that does not persist beyond the expression that defines it, such as an intermediate function result which is never stored in a variable.
Apr 17, 2013 · The behavior of an implicitly generated move constructor is to perform a member-wise move of the data members of the type for which it is generated. Per Parahgraph 12.8/15 of the C++11 Standard: The implicitly-defined copy/move constructor for a non-union class X performs a memberwise copy/move of its bases and members.
Sep 4, 2014 · The compiler will generate a default move constructor if you don't specify one in the base class (except some cases, e.g. there's a base class with a deleted move constructor) but you should, in any case, call explicitly the base class' one if you have it: Sub(Sub&& o) : Base(std::move(o)) edited Sep 4, 2014 at 12:14.
Oct 24, 2015 · 8. Yes, there is a point. Objects which manage resources (perhaps physical ones) that cannot/should not be shared between objects is the first example that comes to mind. 1) You wrote it incorrectly. Here is what I think you want based on this question and your previous one.
Sep 11, 2013 · 2. That's what the standard says (12.8/15): The implicitly-defined copy/move constructor for a non-union class X performs a memberwise copy/move of its bases and members. [ Note: brace-or-equal-initializers of non-static data members are ignored. See also the example in 12.6.2. —end note ] The order of initialization is the same as the order ...
Move the member vector to a local vector, clear the member, return the local by value. auto ret = std::move(myVector); myVector.clear(); return ret; This shows by example how to clear the vector after moving from it, and shows a much better option than returning a reference, but doesn't answer the question about what's left in the vector after ...
Aug 14, 2018 · Copying of object is disabled and wanted to only have move cntor and move assignment operator. Q1: How to implement move assignment operator for const ref type properly (Is it correct, what I made)? Q2: Why this. MyClass<int> obj2(std::move(obj)); // will work with move ctor. MyClass<int> obj3 = std::move(obj2); // also move ctor called: Why ...
