Search results
Affective fallacy is a term from literary criticism used to refer to the supposed error of judging or evaluating a text on the basis of its emotional effects on a reader. The term was coined by W.K. Wimsatt and Monroe Beardsley in 1949 as a principle of New Criticism which is often paired with their study of The Intentional Fallacy .
Mar 17, 2016 · An important concept in New Criticism, coined by Wimsatt and Beardsley in an essay in The Verbal Icon, Affective Fallacy refers to the supposed error of judging or evaluating a text on the basis of its emotional effects on a reader.
Affective fallacy, according to the followers of New Criticism, the misconception that arises from judging a poem by the emotional effect that it produces in the reader. The concept of affective fallacy is a direct attack on impressionistic criticism, which argues that the reader’s response to a.
In literary criticism, the term Affective Fallacy is the mistake that critics make when they attribute or try to measure a text or poem’s literary value or merit against the emotional or sensory reactions it generates in its readers.
Definition of Affective Fallacy. In simple terms, affective fallacy is when you decide something is good or bad based on how it makes you feel, not on real facts or solid reasons. For example, just because you feel happy when you eat ice cream doesn’t mean it’s good for your health.
May 11, 2022 · The affective fallacy: Just as we cannot know the meaning of a text by knowing the intention of the author, in the same way we cannot know the meaning of the literary text by simply interpreting the reader’s personal response to it.
Jan 27, 2018 · In addition to their other works, the critic Wimsatt (1907–1975) and the philosopher Beardsley (1915–1985) produced two influential and controversial papers that propounded central positions of New Criticism, “The Intentional Fallacy” (1946) and The Affective Fallacy (1949).
Jul 14, 2024 · affective fallacy. Quick Reference. A tendency to relate the meaning of a text to its readers' interpretations, which is criticized as a form of relativism by those literary theorists who claim that meaning resides primarily within the text ( see also literalism).
The Affective Fallacy is a confusion between. the poem and its results (what it is and what it does), a special case of epistemological skepticism, though usually advanced as if it had far stronger claims than the overall forms of skepti cism. It begins by trying to derive the standard of criticism.
Dec 24, 2010 · The concept “affective fallacy” refers to a confusion between two elements of a literary text: what the text is (its linguistic and rhetorical elements) and what it does (its effects on the reader).
