Search results
Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited vs V. Anand Prasad And 4 Ors. on 29 January, 2004. Warning on translation. Get this document in PDF. Print it on a file/printer. Select the following parts of the judgment.
- V. Anand Prasad vs State Of Telangana on 1 June, 2021
V. Anand Prasad vs State Of Telangana on 1 June, 2021....
- Anand Prasad Agarwalla vs Tarkeshwar Prasad And Ors on 9 May ...
Appeal (civil) 882-883 of 2001 PETITIONER: ANAND PRASAD...
- V. Anand Prasad vs State Of Telangana on 1 June, 2021
Mar 5, 2022 · However, in Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd. v. V. Anand Prasad[16] the appellant was the registered proprietor of the mark “Fortwin” (Pentazocine injection) and had been using the mark since 1975, relating to pharmaceutical preparation for treatment of some bone-related disorder.
Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd v/s Anand Prasad & 4 others. The appellant was the registered proprietor of the mark ‘Fortwin’ and had been using the mark since 1975, relating to pharmaceutical preparation for treatment of some bone related disorder.
Jun 1, 2021 · V. Anand Prasad vs State Of Telangana on 1 June, 2021. Warning on translation. Get this document in PDF. Print it on a file/printer. Download Court Copy. Select the following parts of the judgment. Facts. Issues. Petitioner's Arguments.
May 9, 2001 · Appeal (civil) 882-883 of 2001 PETITIONER: ANAND PRASAD AGARWALLA Vs. RESPONDENT: TARKESHWAR PRASAD AND ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/05/2001 BENCH: S. Rajendra Babu & Shivaraj V. Patil JUDGMENT:
The District Court, Anand passed an order dated 25 April 2007, ruling that it was a clear case of infringement and restrained the two from using the Amul trademark. Amul Chasmaghar had challenged this interim injunction in the Gujarat High Court.
#TDP #BhavyaAnandPrasad #BhavyaCementsWatch Ntv Live Here: https://rb.gy/20wffsWatch for all latest Coronavirus live updates in Telugu from the Telugu states...
- 3 min
- 38K
- NTV Telugu
