Search results
Aug 11, 2020 · This Court in Controller of Estate Duty (supra), placed reliance on Satrughan Isser v. Sabujpari, & Ors., AIR 1967 SC 272. In case the right to partition by a widow has not been exercised, there is no severance of Hindu coparcenary, and on death of coparcener, there is no dissolution of coparcenary.
Oct 1, 2020 · To know more about the Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma & Others, along with 7 other matters in brief, please refer to the video below: After the amendment Act of 2005, a Division bench of the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India, in the case of Prakash & Others Vs.
So in Vineeta sharma v. Rakesh Sharma a three judge constitutional bench was setup to resolve the issues and give the correct interpretation of section 6 of the amended Hindu Succession Act, 2005.
In a significant and groundbreaking verdict, the Supreme Court delivered a momentous judgment on August 11th, 2020, in the case of Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma, effectively dismantling male chauvinism prevalent in the division of Hindu ancestral property.
Jan 18, 2024 · This paper attempts to provide a comprehensive review of the historic case of Vineeta Sharma vs Rakesh Sharma, focusing on the legal issues of women’s property rights in India, as well as the challenges and progress women have made in gaining equal rights in property ownership. It delves into the history of women’s property rights, the 2005 ...
Jan 13, 2022 · One of the most welcomed and awaited verdicts on the rights of women, especially as daughters in the property of the family by birth, had arrived in a famous case of Vineeta Sharma v. Rakesh Sharma, which was also part of various Special leave petitions dealt with that major issue.
Mar 29, 2024 · The case of Vineeta Sharma v Rakesh Sharma dealt with the interpretation of amended Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, which granted daughters equal coparcenary rights as sons.
Aug 11, 2020 · Vineeta Sharma vs Rakesh Sharma on 11 August, 2020. Get this document in PDF. Print it on a file/printer. Download Court Copy. Select the following parts of the judgment. For entire document. Select how this document cites others.
Apr 16, 2021 · This is a landmark judgment that revolves around the concept of joint Hindu family and coparcenary rights of the daughters. Citation : REFERENCE: Civil Appeal No. Diary No. 32601 of 2018. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11th August 2020. JUDGES: Justice Arun Mishra, Justice S. Abdul Nazeer, Justice M. R. Shah. PARTIES.
Jul 27, 2021 · The verdict of Vineeta Sharma has cleared the uncertainty about the law & made it clear that the amendment of the Hindu Succession Act, granting equal right to inherit the ancestral property to daughters would have a retrospective effect.
