Yahoo India Web Search

Search results

  1. Jun 28, 2024 · Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, as it originally stood, was interpreted to punish men and women and for the act of “unnatural sex”. Unnatural sexual acts were held to be penetrative penile–non-vaginal sexual acts, that is penile–oral, penile–anal sex and sexual acts between human beings and animals. The rationale was that sex ...

  2. 2 days ago · Section 377 of the IPC says “Whoever voluntarily has carnal intercourse against the order of nature with any man, woman or animal, shall be punished with imprisonment for life, or with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to ten years, and shall also be liable to fine.”. Initially section 377 criminalised the ...

  3. 5 days ago · Omission of IPC Section 377: The BNS omits IPC Section 377, which previously criminalized certain sexual acts. This omission may impact legal protections against sexual offences.

  4. 5 days ago · The BNS, with a seemingly progressive outlook, entirely leaves out the contentious Section 377 of the IPC which criminalises “carnal intercourse against the order of nature”. In 2018, this provision had been read down by the apex court in its landmark Navtej Singh Johar v Union of India ruling to the extent that it criminalised consensual ...

  5. 5 days ago · While the new criminal law promises to overhaul the country’s criminal justice system, exclusion of the erstwhile IPC Section 377 which used to deal with carnal intercourse against the order of ...

  6. 2 days ago · There is nothing similar to this Section in the BNS. “Carnal intercourse against the order of nature” as mentioned in the erstwhile Section 377 has now been replaced by the curious phrase “unnatural lust”. It occurs only twice in the document: Once in Section 38 (d) – in the context of “The right to the private defence of the body …

  7. People also ask

  8. 6 days ago · The Act criminalises physical, sexual, verbal, emotional and economic abuse of transgenders with a punishment for a term which shall not be less than six months and may extend to two years with a fine. However, this provision does little to address the problem.