Search results
May 24, 2020 · Tehseen Poonawalla, a social activist, filed a writ petition under Art. 32 of the Constitution against the Respondent States. Tushar Gandhi filed the second PIL to initiate State responsibility for such mob incidents.
Tehseen S. Poonawalla vs Union Of India on 17 July, 2018. Warning on translation. Get this document in PDF. Print it on a file/printer. Download Court Copy. Select the following parts of the judgment. Facts. Issues. Petitioner's Arguments.
In this landmark case of Tehseen Poonawalla vs. Union of India and others, the bench led by former CJI Deepak Mishra which comprising of A.M. Khanwilkar and Dr D.Y. Chandrachud, JJ passed a judgement in order to tackle this situation present in the country.
Jul 20, 2018 · The Supreme Court delivered its judgment in two writ petitions filed by Tehseen Poonawalla and Tushar Gandhi against the growing menace of mob violence. The first petition was filed by activist Tehseen Poonawalla who sought Court’s intervention in checking the increasing incidents of cow vigilantism.
After a cloudburst of incidents of mob lynching over the last few years, Tehseen Poonawalla, a distressed social activist, filed a writ petition under Article 32 of the constitution. They sought the court to issue a direction to the centre and some states to take action against cow vigilantes.
Jun 9, 2017 · Get free access to the complete judgment in Tehseen S. Poonawalla v. Union Of India And Others on CaseMine.
Sep 7, 2018 · In pursuance of our judgment dated 17.07.2018, as per Office Report, ten States, namely, the States of Tamil Nadu, Madhya Pradesh, Gujarat, Jharkhand, Tripura, Assam, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh, Rajasthan and Bihar and two Union Territories, namely, Lakshdweep and Puducherry have filed Compliance Reports. Print PDF.
