Search results
Sep 2, 2024 · In doing so, the Golden Triangle Court upheld fundamental rights in the case of Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India was known for understanding the requirements of working democracy. The base of the golden triangle that forms the 14th, 19th and 21st sections is examined.
6 hours ago · In Maneka Gandhi, v., Union, of India (1978), the judgment of A.K. Gopalan was revisited in terms of the due process requirement under Article 21. While deciding the issue of whether the right to ...
Sep 10, 2024 · Judgment. The Supreme Court ruled that the government’s action in impounding Gandhi’s passport was unconstitutional. It broadened the scope of Article 21 (Right to Life and Personal Liberty), ruling that any law affecting personal liberty must pass a test of fairness, reasonableness, and justness.
Sep 2, 2024 · The Maneka Gandhi case, 1978 broadened the interpretation of Article 21, expanding the scope of the right to life and personal liberty.
4 days ago · This decision was later overturned in Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India (1978), which expanded the scope of Article 21. B. Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) A landmark case that reaffirmed the importance of judicial review. The petitioner challenged the 24th, 25th, and 29th Amendments, claiming they infringed upon the right to property.
Sep 20, 2024 · The Supreme Court will hear on Monday two petitions filed by senior BJP leader and former Union Minister Maneka Gandhi, one against the election of Samajwadi Party MP Ram Bhuwal Nishad from the Sultanpur Lok Sabha constituency, and another challenging the constitutional validity of Section 81 of the Representation of People Act, 1951.
Sep 20, 2024 · Upon hearing senior BJP leader Maneka Gandhi's plea challenging Section 81 of the Representation of People Act, 1951, the Supreme Court today asked Senior Advocate Siddharth Luthra (appearing...
