Yahoo India Web Search

Search results

  1. People also ask

  2. 2 days ago · Hamilton opposed a bill of rights in The Federalist No. 84, stating that "the constitution is itself in every rational sense, and to every useful purpose, a bill of rights."

  3. Jul 3, 2024 · Federalist papers, series of 85 essays on the proposed new Constitution of the United States and on the nature of republican government, published between 1787 and 1788 by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay in an effort to persuade New York state voters to support ratification.

    • The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica
  4. Jun 24, 2024 · nvention, but a few months later in Federalist 84. Hamilton wrote that a bill of rights would be ''not only unnecessary in the pr posed constitution. but would even be dangerous.'' And he asked, ''why declare thing

  5. Jul 4, 2024 · Summary: The Federalists supported a strong central government and the ratification of the U.S. Constitution, arguing it was necessary for national unity and economic stability. The...

  6. Jul 5, 2024 · Are there good reasons why James Wilson and The Federalist dismiss the absence of a bill of rights as a vital issue in the proposed Constitution? (See "James Wilson's State House Speech" (1787), The Federalist Farmer (1787), "Richard Henry Lee to Edmund Randolph" (1787), and Federalist 84 (1788).)

  7. Jun 26, 2024 · The Federalist Papers, written for the New York ratifying convention in support of the proposed constitution, are among the greatest commentaries on the design and function of the federal Constitution.

  8. Jul 2, 2024 · In Federalist No. 84, Alexander Hamilton presented the reasons why he thought a bill of rights was not necessary and actually could cause great problems. He explains that the idea of a bill of rights originated with kings whose powers needed to be checked.