Search results
The pre-production work for making of the Tamil version of "Aaranya Kaandam", according to the appellant, commenced in and about July, 2007. 2.3. It is also claimed that between July-January, 2008, several other producers had expressed interest in producing a Tamil film, based on the script, written by the appellant.
Experienced Chief Executive Officer with a demonstrated history of working in the entertainment industry. Skilled in Advertising, Integrated Marketing, Film, Digital Marketing, and An actor in Tamil industry. Strong business development professional with a BA focused in English Literature from Government Arts College,Coimbatore. | Learn more about Chris Jerome's work experience, education, connections & more by visiting their profile on LinkedIn
- 352 followers
Feb 6, 2023 · Deduction rates of 2.5% or 4.0% apply to the construction costs of the capital works, depending on: the date construction began. the type of capital works. how they're used. If it isn't possible to determine the actual construction costs, you can get an estimate from a quantity surveyor or other independent qualified person.
Sep 8, 2016 · A copyright of cinematograph film shall not affect the separate copyright of a work, which forms part of it. Section 2(d) of the Act includes a producer of a cinematograph film in a definition of an author. Thus, a producer of a cinematograph film is an author entitled for protecting his copy right. 10.3.
Mar 13, 2018 · Conclusion. From the judgement of the above discussed case it can be concluded that the producer is the person who takes initiative to make the film and he is the author of the cinematograph of the film and hence holds the right over it. Dubbing is included in "communication to the public". Dubbing is also part of the cinematograph and only ...
Feb 25, 2013 · Capital Film Works Madras High CourtFeb 25, 2013. Thiagarajan v. Capital Film Works. CASE NO. Application No. 5178 of 2012 in C.S No. 93 of 2012. For the Appellant: Ananth, Advocate. For the Respondent: Kavitha, Advocate. Section 14 (1) (d) (iii) of the Copy Right Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), provisions of law.19.
Feb 12, 2020 · M/s Capital Film Works and Anr. where the issue was with respect to the remake rights of a producer, the Court held that the producer does not have the right to remake a film as that would be substantially similar to the underlying works of the film. Therefore, this judgment also leans toward the physical copy doctrine, giving a narrow ...
