Search results
Aug 19, 2011 · Petitioner: M/s Prakash Jha Productions & Anr. Respondent: Union of India & Ors. Apeal: Writ Petition (Civil) No. 345 of 2011. [Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India] Judges: Dr. Mukundakam Sharma & Anil R. Dave, JJ. Date of Judgment: Aug 19, 2011. Appearances: Appearances.
Oct 19, 2012 · Order. 1. Taken on Board. 2. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel for Respondents 1 to 3 and having looked into the lyrics and the song in question, we are of the view that the same is in poor taste and the wordings indicating the names of certain business houses could have been avoided.
Sep 25, 2011 · 25 September 2011. Upholding the right to freedom of speech and expression, the Supreme Court recently set aside a ban by the government of Uttar Pradesh on the screening of a film. Allowing an appeal in Prakash Jha Productions v Union of India and referring to a 1989 ruling by it, the court said: “in a democracy it is not necessary that ...
Aug 14, 2016 · In fresh trouble for filmmaker Prakash Jha, Phantom Films has served a Rs. 1 crore notice to his production house, alleging that the film Jai Gangaajal was made without sequel rights.. Phantom ...
Aug 21, 2022 · Presenting the Official Trailer of Matto Ki Saikil. Dive into the life of Matto, and witness the patience and injustice of a daily wage earner.Releasing on16...
- 3 min
- 2.8M
- Prakash Jha Productions
Case Number: Writ Petition (Civil) No. 345 of 2011: Judges: Mukundakam Sharma and Anil R. Dave, JJ. Issue: Uttar Pradesh Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1955 - Section 6 and 6(1); Cinematograph Act, 1952; Cinematograph Act, 1958 - Sections 3 and 4; Constitution of India - Article 19(1)
Oct 17, 2012 · Prakash Jha Productions vs Bata India Limited & Ors. on 17 October, 2012. Author: Pradeep Nandrajog. $~17. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of Decision: October 17, 2012. + FAO(OS) 505/2012.
