Search results
HTML <i> and <em> Elements. The HTML <i> element defines a part of text in an alternate voice or mood. The content inside is typically displayed in italic. Tip: The <i> tag is often used to indicate a technical term, a phrase from another language, a thought, a ship name, etc.
The <i> tag defines a part of text in an alternate voice or mood. The content inside is typically displayed in italic. The <i> tag is often used to indicate a technical term, a phrase from another language, a thought, a ship name, etc. Use the <i> element only when there is not a more appropriate semantic element, such as: <em> (emphasized text)
Jun 27, 2024 · Making text italic in HTML can be achieved using the <em> (emphasis) tag, the <i> (italic) tag, or by applying CSS styles. Each method has its unique use case and semantic meaning. This article will cover all approaches with examples to help you effectively use italics in your web content.
Mar 22, 2021 · In previous versions of HTML, the <i> tag was used to display text in italics. But in HTML 5, the definition has changed. We are going to explore that new definition and learn about other ways to style text in italics using CSS. What is the <i> tag?
Jan 21, 2010 · When you wish to apply emphasis to a word, phrase or sentence, stick it in <em> tags regardless of whether you want italics or not. If you want to change the styling in some other way, use CSS: em { font-weight: bold; font-style: normal; } .
Both <em> and <i> make the font italic. However, <em> tag is a semantic tag that indicates that the text inside the tag is spoken with a stressed emphasis when compared to surrounding texts. Screen Readers will also emphasize text inside the <em> tag. Whereas the <i> tag only make the text italic.
Feb 22, 2024 · In earlier versions of the HTML specification, the <i> element was merely a presentational element used to display text in italics, much like the <b> element was used to display text in bold letters. This is no longer true, as these tags now define semantics rather than typographic appearance.
