Yahoo India Web Search

Search results

  1. Trận Karnal. Mir Qamar-ud-din Khan Siddiqi Bayafandi (20/08/1671 - 01/06/1748) còn được gọi là Chin Qilich Kamaruddin Khan, Nizam-ul-Mulk, Asaf JahNizam I, là Nizam đầu tiên của Hyderabad. Ông vốn là một vị tướng có xuất thân quý tộc dưới trướng của Hoàng đế Mogul Aurangzeb (1677–1707), vào ...

  2. Nizam-ul-Mulk - Asaf Jah I. Mir Qamar-ud-din Khan Siddiqi Bayafandi, the first Nizam of Hyderabad, was born on 11 August 1671 and died on 1 June 1748. He was also known as Chin Qilich Kamaruddin Khan, Nizam-ul-Mulk, Asaf Jah, and Nizam I. He began his career as a favourite of Mughal emperor Aurangzeb, who promoted him to the rank of general.

  3. Aug 5, 2017 · Nizam-ul-Mulk Asaf Jah I (1724–48) Nizam-ul-Mulk’s greatest achievement was the foundation of the princely state of Hyderabad. As the Viceroy of the Deccan, the Nizam was the head of the ...

  4. Jun 26, 2024 · Nizam-ul-Mulk, Asaf Jah I. Mir Qamar-ud-din Khan Siddiqi (11 August 1671 – 1 June 1748) also known as Chin Qilich Qamaruddin Khan, Nizam-ul-Mulk, Asaf Jah and Nizam I, was the first Nizam of Hyderabad. He was married to the daughter of a Syed nobleman of Gulbarga. [1] He began his career as a favourite of the Mughal emperor Aurangzeb, who ...

  5. Nizam-ul-Mulk, Asaf Jah I. Mir Qamar-ud-din Khan Siddiqi Bayafandi (20 August 1671 – 1 June 1748) was a nobleman of Indian and Turkic descent [1] and the founder of the Asaf Jahi dynasty. He established the Hyderabad state, and ruled it from 1724 to 1748. [2]

  6. Here Nizam-ul-Mulk entered his litter, plainly fitted with broad-cloth, while the vazir used one fringed with pearls and covered with cloth of gold. The vazir allowed Nizam-ul-Mulk to be two paces ahead of him to show his respect to him. At the drum-house they alighted, and hand in hand entered the privy audience-hall.

  7. Aug 27, 2020 · Hyderabad: “Nizam Ul Mulk Asaf Jah in his early life was brought up in the traditions of Aurangzeb, probably he resembles him more closely then he does any other leader; the similarity consists in their possession of a distinct political aim and their capacity to achieve it. To both, welfare of the state was the first consideration in contradistinction to personal ends.”