Search results
Apr 15, 2020 · Edited collections are widely supposed to contain lesser work than scholarly journals; to be incoherent as volumes, no more than the sum of their parts; and to be less visible to potential readers once published.
- Register
Welcome to Cambridge Core
- Register
Edited collections are widely supposed to contain lesser work than scholarly journals; to be incoherent as volumes, no more than the sum of their parts; and to be less visible to potential readers once published.
- Michael A. Peters, Petar Jandrić, Sarah Hayes
- 2021
Edited collections are widely supposed to contain lesser work than scholarly journals; to be incoherent as volumes, no more than the sum of their parts; and to be less visible to poten- tial readers once published.
Feb 11, 2021 · Edited collections are widely supposed to contain lesser work than scholarly journals; to be incoherent as volumes, no more than the sum of their parts; and to be less visible to...
Edited collections are widely supposed to contain lesser work than scholarly journals; to be incoherent as volumes, no more than the sum of their parts; and to be less visible...
Jun 12, 2020 · As a form of academic publishing, the edited collection has had a bad press. Widely supposed to contain lesser work than scholarly journals, they have been suspected of incoherence as volumes – of being no more than the sum of their parts.
People also ask
Are edited collections better than scholarly journals?
What is an edited collection?
Should the edited collection be retheorized?
Is the edited collection a scholarly model of community?
Apr 15, 2020 · Edited collections are widely supposed to contain lesser work than scholarly journals; to be incoherent as volumes, no more than the sum of their parts; and to be less visible to...