Search results
scheduled from 05.05.2016 to 18.06.2016. Though the applicant had given his willingness to attend the promotion cadre, he was seeking a waiver for which an appropriate certificate from a medical officer was mandatory. Despite efforts, the applicant did not get the requisite certificate. Even OA 605/2016 (ka Prasad Page 7 of17
cause in not filing the OA on time. 3. Hence, the delay of 75 days caused in filing the OA is condoned. MA stands allowed. OA 605/2016 As agreed to by the learned counsel for the parties, list the OA for admission on 20.10.2016.
31.05.2016 Learned counsel for the respondents seeks and is granted three weeks’ time to examine the question of maintainability of the OA. Meanwhile, reply may be filed in respect of the MA, which is an application for condonation of delay in filing the OA. Let the matter be listed for considering the MA on 09.08.2016.
15) The DRT, vide order dated 10.02.2020, dismissed the Application No. 1608/2019 under Order 7 Rule 11 filed by the petitioners, and the borrower company.
During the course of hearing of this OA the Ld. Advocate for the applicant has pointed out that in the impugned order dated 29.2.2016 the Commissioner of Police, Solapur has dismissed the applicant from service on two grounds.
The Tribunal having held in favour of the respondent and upon the dismissal of a petition seeking review, the Union of India and the Railway Authorities instituted writ proceedings before the Bombay High Court.
People also ask
When will a notice of OA be issued?
Why was IA 2691 of 2019 dismissed?
Did Supreme Court dismiss instant review petition?
Can a presiding officer condone a delay in filing a counter claim?
Nov 24, 2020 · That the Hyderabad Bench of the Hon’ble Central Administrative Tribunal had dismissed the OA Nos. 331/2019 and 332/2019 praying for the same relief by the applicant., vide its order dated 04.06.2019.
