Yahoo India Web Search

Search results

  1. Aug 18, 2021 · The Supreme Court reaffirmed the settled position of law by explaining that: “Mere overruling of the principles, on which the earlier judgment was passed, by a subsequent judgment of higher forum will not have the effect of uprooting the final adjudication between the parties and set it at naught. Facts and Appeal.

  2. Jun 28, 2022 · View of the Supreme Court of India on extent, expiry and duration of interim orders. Not many judgments are available of the Supreme Court on the issue of duration and existence of interlocutory orders. However, there are two judgments that have taken a strict view on their operability, while there are some others on the other end of the spectrum.

  3. Apr 20, 2022 · Whether respondents committed contempt of Court or not? Section 2 (b) of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 defines “civil contempt” as wilful disobedience to any judgment, decree, direction, order, writ or other process of a court or wilful breach of an undertaking given to a Court.

  4. 2 days ago · In a major setback for the Gujarat government, the Supreme Court has rejected to remove remarks from its order regarding the release of convicts in the Bilkis Bano case. A bench of Justices B V Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan also rejected the application for listing review petition in open court. “Having carefully gone through the Review ...

  5. In our view, passing interim orders indiscriminately and without apparent and due application of mind, which has the effect of allowing the plaintiff to continue to enjoy

  6. Sep 1, 2021 · Civil contempt. According to Section 2 (b) of the Contempt of Courts Act, civil contempt means willful disobedience by a person to any of the court’s orders, judgment, decree, direction, writ or willful breach of an undertaking given by a person to the court.

  7. People also ask

  8. But even though, Section 66A of the IT Act, 2000 has been struck down by Supreme Court's Order dated 24th March, 2015 numerous cases has been filed against the innocent people under Section 66A. Police officers and even subordinate court judges were not aware of this supreme court's order.