Search results
- Wegener had a lot of evidence to support his hypothesis. But he had a problem. The problem was that he could not explain how the continents could move through the oceans.
People also ask
What were Wegener's problems?
Why was Alfred Wegener criticized?
What did Alfred Wegener believe?
When did Alfred Wegener die?
In his work, Wegener presented a large amount of observational evidence in support of continental drift, but the mechanism remained a problem, partly because Wegener's estimate of the velocity of continental motion, 250 cm/year, was too high. [25]
Sep 17, 2024 · How did Alfred Wegener impact the world? Wegener published his theory in full in 1915, but his contemporaries mostly found it implausible. By 1930 it had been rejected by most geologists , and it sank into obscurity for the next few decades.
- The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica
Wegener died in 1930 on an expedition in Greenland. Poorly respected in his lifetime, Wegener and his ideas about moving continents seemed destined to be lost in history as fringe science. However, in the 1950s, evidence started to trickle in that made continental drift a more viable idea.
Aug 24, 2024 · The problem with this hypothesis is the improbability of a land bridge being tall and long enough to stretch across a broad, deep ocean. More support for continental drift came from the puzzling evidence that glaciers once existed in normally very warm areas in southern Africa, India, Australia, and Arabia.
Jan 11, 2021 · Wegener had a lot of evidence to support his hypothesis. But he had a problem. The problem was that he could not explain how the continents could move through the oceans.
Alfred Wegener published his idea that the continents had been joined as a single landmass, which he called Pangaea, about 300 million years ago. Wegener’s idea was mostly ridiculed, in part because Wegener could not develop a plausible mechanism for continents moving through oceanic crust.
Jul 24, 2019 · One of the biggest flaws of Wegener’s continental drift theory was that he did not have a viable explanation for how continental drift could have occurred. He proposed two different mechanisms, but each was weak and could be disproven.