Search results
Feb 4, 2023 · If that’s so, then a figure like the political philosopher Michael Walzer, a socialist committed to a deep transformation of American society, cannot rightly be called a liberal.
- James Traub
Walzer is usually identified as one of the leading proponents of the communitarian position in political theory, along with Alasdair MacIntyre and Michael J. Sandel. Like Sandel and MacIntyre, Walzer is not completely comfortable with this label. [6] However, he has long argued that political theory must be grounded in the traditions and ...
Mar 31, 2023 · Walzer’s liberal is a child of the Enlightenment; they recognise the claims of all human agents, as “rational” (Kantian) ends-in-themselves, and are neither uncritical nor cynical but tolerant of what they may reasonably tolerate.
Jan 17, 2023 · Michael Walzer fully embraces liberalism, while Patrick Deneen offers a sophisticated critique of it. Finally, Francis Fukuyama generally defends liberalism, but has some caveats. This three episode arc begins with Michael Walzer. Michael is an emeritus professor at the Institute for Advanced Study. He was also a longtime editor of Dissent.
May 30, 2023 · In The Struggle for a Decent Politics: On “Liberal” as an Adjective, Michael Walzer muses on the evolution of the word liberal, from indicating a fixed ideology to signifying a ‘universal’ set of values that can be attached to a diverse array of political projects.
Jan 17, 2023 · There was a time when liberalism was an ism like any other, but that time, writes Michael Walzer, is gone. “Liberal” now conveys not a specific ideology but a moral stance, so the word is best conceived not as a noun but as an adjective—one is a “liberal democrat” or a “liberal nationalist.”.
People also ask
Does Michael Walzer support liberalism?
Who is Michael Walzer?
Should we read Michael Walzer?
Is Walzer a liberal socialist?
Dec 16, 2023 · Walzer enters political theorizing on a footing essentially different from mainstream liberalism. A legendary passage in Spheres declares his commitment to “stand in the cave, in the city, on the ground… to interpret to one’s fellow citizens the world of shared meanings that we share” (xiv).
