Search results
A subtle but still palpable tension is felt throughout the movie and the force of evil which forms a big part of movie is just ghastly in weird ways. As the camera pans from frame to frame, it captures only the ugliness of the place called the Laboratory, but this is a kind of ugliness you just cannot look away from.
- The Plot
- The Possible Interpretations
- Is ‘No Smoking’ Just About Smoking?
- The Symbolism
- Final Word
The basic plot goes like this: ‘K’ is a 30-something affluent, narcissistic, arrogant, Patrick Bateman-esque alpha male who is a little too addicted to the ol’ sutta. His wife Anjali chides him incessantly on this habit and wants him to quit. K’s friend Abbas, who lost his fingers in an apparent accident, and his doctor, whose mother is on her deat...
The film opens with three quotes: To do is to be – Socrates. To be is to do – Plato. Do be do be do – Sinatra All three quotes have similar words, signifying the film is open to varied interpretations. The bizarre plot opens the way for two interpretations: Is the core of the film a hallucination induced by Prayogshala? Or does it all happen in a f...
Well, duh, of course not. While on the surface, the film just deals with a man’s obsession with the smoke, it can be considered a commentary on any kind of addiction and a man’s fight with it, conscious as well as subconscious. But even that is pretty evident isn’t it? But on a deeper level, the film can be perceived as the fight between the arroga...
‘No Smoking’ is littered with motifs which seem random at first but convey a deep meaning when mulled upon. Let’s shed some light on the symbolic meaning of some of the film’s recurring patterns: The Two Missing Fingers – The two fingers which the Praypgshala chops off aren’t random; they’re your ‘smoking’ fingers. Literally cutting them signifies ...
‘No Smoking’ is a truly surreal affair with many facets to it. However objective, the views above are influenced by my own psychological wiring. Your interpretation might differ vastly, which is the beauty of the film. Do tell me which parts of my analysis you agree with and which parts seem erroneous. Read More: Andhadhun, Explained
May 23, 2024 · The ending is a bit confusing and each viewer can interpret it differently. The movie does not show the ways one can quit smoking. The story is also not about whether smoking is good or bad, having choices or not at all. K begins to get better and wakes up next to his wife, without his two fingers.
Forget about the mind boggling end to the movie and enjoy it as a thriller instead. The screenplay and the acting is too good and this movie convinced me that john can carry a movie on his own as a lead. Not to forget the career best performance of paresh rawal imo. He was so good that i hated him in the movie.
Oct 26, 2007 · No Smoking: Directed by Anurag Kashyap. With John Abraham, Ayesha Takia, Paresh Rawal, Ranvir Shorey. A heavily addicted smoker is unprepared for the true price he must pay when he asks a guru's help to kick the habit.
- (8.9K)
- Drama, Horror, Mystery
- Anurag Kashyap
- 2007-10-26
No Smoking is a 2007 Indian Hindi -language thriller film [2] written and directed by Anurag Kashyap and co-produced by Vishal Bhardwaj and Kumar Mangat. The film stars John Abraham, Ayesha Takia, Ranvir Shorey and Paresh Rawal in the lead roles, while Bipasha Basu appears in an Item number. [3] The film is loosely based upon the 1978 short ...
People also ask
Is no smoking a good movie?
Is no smoking a Bollywood film?
Is no smoking a cult film?
What is 'no smoking' about?
Is 'no smoking' based on a Stephen King short story?
Who plays John Abraham in 'no smoking'?
Feb 3, 2023 · No Smoking revolves around John Abraham 's K, a narcissistic, self-obsessed and arrogant chainsmoker, who, despite persistent and restless appeals from his wife Anjali (Ayesha Takia), friends and well-wishers, never lets the habit go. Whenever we see John Abraham on screen, he is either lighting a cigarette or smoking one.
