Search results
- The Apex Court held that both Gurunath Meiyappan and Raj Kundra as ‘team officials’ of CSK and Rajasthan Royals respectively were liable for imposition of sanctions against them under Rule 6.4 of the IPL Operational Rules, which could result in their suspension from being involved in IPL matches for a specified period or even lead to suspension of their team itself from taking part in the tournament.
www.thenewsminute.com/news/supreme-court-judgment-ipl-corruption-case-explained-22910The Supreme Court judgment in the ‘IPL Corruption case’ explained
People also ask
Could Srinivasan's son-in-law be guilty of illegal betting on IPL games?
Will there be a threat to IPL in 2015?
Did Bombay High Court deem probe panel 'illegal'?
How did the BCCI challenge the Bombay High Court order?
Mudgal panel submits final report in IPL corruption case. The Mudgal committee investigating spot-fixing allegations in the IPL has submitted its final report to the Supreme Court, which will...
Feb 25, 2015 · The Apex Court held that both Gurunath Meiyappan and Raj Kundra as ‘team officials’ of CSK and Rajasthan Royals respectively were liable for imposition of sanctions against them under Rule 6.4 ...
May 22, 2014 · The Supreme Court on Thursday declined to reinstate ousted BCCI chief N Srinivasan and pulled him up for seeking a modification of the previous order passed in the IPL corruption case. A vacation bench of Justices B S Chauhan and A K Sikri questioned why Srinivasan was asking for a modification now and did not argue against it when the order ...
- 153
In what has come as a relief to former India fast bowler Sreesanth, the Supreme Court has "set aside" the life ban imposed on him by the BCCI for his alleged role in the 2013 IPL corruption and...
May 16, 2014 · The BCCI had objected to bringing back the Mudgal panel for further investigation, contending that the panel’s indictment of Srinivasan and Indian captain M S Dhoni over an alleged cover-up in the IPL corruption case “had no basis” and was “erroneous.”
- 153
Sep 12, 2013 · The Supreme Court on Wednesday could not hear the Board of Control for Cricket in India versus Cricket Association of Bihar case. The case was listed at No. 16 but the day's proceedings finished...
Apr 30, 2014 · The BCCI on Tuesday challenged the credibility of the Mudgal panel in the Supreme Court, saying its indictment of ousted chief N Srinivasan and India captain M S Dhoni over an alleged cover-up in the IPL corruption case “had no basis” and was “erroneous.”