Search results
In this manner, the Act strikes at the very privacy of each individual thereby offending the right to privacy which is elevated and given the status of fundamental right by tracing it to Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India by a nine Judge Bench judgment of this Court in K.S. Puttaswamy & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.6. Most of ...
This judgment has been divided into sections to facilitate analysis. They are : A The reference B Decision in M P Sharma C Decision in Kharak Singh D Gopalan doctrine: fundamental rights as isolated silos E Cooper and Maneka: Interrelationship between rights F Origins of privacy G Natural and inalienable rights
Puttaswamy Case Judgement. The Court in its judgement stressed upon the following points: It was held that privacy concerns in this day and age of technology can arise from both the state as well as non-state entities and as such, a claim of violation of privacy lies against both of them.
Apr 10, 2020 · Judgment: A nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court of India passed a landmark judgment on 24th August 2017, upholding the fundamental right to privacy under Article 21 of the constitution of India. Article 21 of the Constitution reads as:
May 13, 2024 · In this landmark judgment a nine judges' bench of Supreme court held that the right to privacy is protected as an intrinsic part of the right to life and personal liberty under Article 21 and as a part of the freedoms guaranteed by Part III of the Constitution.
Aug 23, 2017 · In 2012, Justice K S Puttaswamy, a retired judge of the High Court, filed a writ petition in the Supreme Court challenging the constitutional validity of the Aadhaar scheme introduced by the UPA Government.
Aug 26, 2019 · Two years ago, in August 2017,a nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court in Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd) Vs Union of India unanimously held that Indians have a constitutionally protected fundamental right to privacy that is an intrinsic part of life and liberty under Article 21.
