Search results
Jan 6, 2021 · The Supreme Court of India in Nandini Satpathy vs. Dani (P.L.) And Anr case gave an interpretation regarding the right of an accused person to be silent while police interrogation in relation to Article 20 (3) of the Indian Constitution and Section 161 (1) of the CrPC.
Nandini Satpathy, a former Chief Minister of Orissa and one time minister at the national level was directed to appear at the Vigilance, Police Station, Cuttack, in September last year, for being examined in connection with a case registered against her by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance, Cuttack, under section 5 (2) read with ...
May 20, 2020 · Case title: Nandini Satpathy vs Dani (P.L.) And Anr on 7 April, 1978. Court: Supreme Court of India. Bench: J. Jaswant Singh, V.D. Tulzapurkar and V.R. Krishna Iyer. Parties: Petitioner: Nandini Satpathy. Respondent: DANI (P.L.) AND ANR. Citation: 1978 AIR 1025, 1978 SCR (3) 608. Facts of the case:
Apr 24, 2020 · ISSUE IN NANDINI SATPATHY V. P. L. DANI AND ANR. The principal issue in the present case was to determine the ambit of Article 20 (3) of the Constitution and, that of S. 161 (2) of Cr.P.C. ARGUMENTS BY APPELLANT.
Mar 16, 2024 · Nandini Satpathy v. P.L. Dani (AIR 1978 SC 1025) was a landmark case in Indian legal history concerning the right against self-incrimination. The case involved corruption charges against Nandini Satpathy, the former Chief Minister of Odisha, for misusing her position while in office. The key figures in the case were:
Nandini Satpathy, a former Chief Minister of Orissa and one time minister at the national level was directed to appear at the Vigilance, Police Station, Cuttack, in September last year, for being examined in connection with a case registered against her by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance, Cuttack, under section 5 (2) read with ...
May 15, 2019 · In this case, the legality of initiating proceedings under section 179 of IPC which provides for punishment for failing to truthfully answer a question asked by a public officer was questioned. Facts
Apr 7, 1978 · In the case of Nandini Satpathy vs Dani (P.L.) And Anr on 7 April, 1978, the Supreme Court of India was presented with a significant legal issue concerning the right to silence and self-incrimination.
A people whose consciousness of rights is poor, a land where legal services at-the incipient stages are, rare and an investigative personnel whose random resort to third degree technology has ancient roots-these and a host of other realistic factors must come into the Court's ken when interpreting and effectuating the constitutional right of t...
The basic facts which have given rise to this case need to be narrated but the law we have to settle reminds us, not of a quondam minister, the appellant, but of the numerous indigents, illiterates and agrestics who are tensed and perplexed, by police processes in station recesses, being unversed in the arcame implications of Art. 20(3) and ...
