Search results
In economics, the Leontief's paradox is that a country with a higher capital per worker has a lower capital/labor ratio in exports than in imports. This econometric finding was the result of Wassily W. Leontief 's attempt to test the Heckscher–Ohlin theory ("H–O theory") empirically.
Jul 17, 2021 · The Leontief Paradox. Leontief also studied trade flows in the 1950s. Based on input-output analysis of international trade he discovered that the U.S., a country with a great deal of capital,...
How are we to explain Leontief’s paradoxical results that the most capital rich of all countries, the U.S. exports labour intensive goods? Leontief himself explained the contradiction by reference to measures of labour supply.
Mar 22, 2024 · Formulated by economist Wassily Leontief in 1953, this paradox reveals that, contrary to the predictions of Heckscher-Ohlin, the United States—an economy abundant in capital—exported labor-intensive goods while importing capital-intensive goods.
Introduction to the Leontief Paradox: The Heckscher-Ohlin theorem gave a generalisation that the capital-abundant counties tend to export capital-intensive goods while labour- abundant countries tend to export the labour- intensive goods.
Apr 2, 2024 · Leontief Paradox is an economic theory relevant in the international trade of goods and commodities worldwide. It was proposed by Nobel Prize winner Wassily Leontief, a Russian-American economist and world-renowned professor.
Overview. Leontief paradox. Quick Reference. The observation by Wassily Leontief (1906–1999) that in spite of being the world's most capital-rich country, the US appeared on average to have exports that were slightly more labour-intensive than its imports.
…intensive, became known as the Leontief Paradox because it disputed the Heckscher-Ohlin theory. Recent efforts in international economics have attempted to refine the Heckscher-Ohlin model and test it on a wider range of empirical evidence.
Jan 1, 2017 · Using 1947 US input–output tables and data on exports and imports, Leontief (1953) found, to the surprise of the profession, that the capital per worker of US exports was less than the capital per worker of US import substitutes.
In 1956 Leontief repeated the test for US imports and exports which prevailed in 1951. In his second study, Leontief aggregated industries into 192 industries. He found that US imports were still more capital-intensive than US exports. US imports were 6% more capital-intensive (k m = 1.06 k x ).
