Yahoo India Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: Richard Swinburne
  2. ebay.com has been visited by 1M+ users in the past month

    But did you check eBay? Check Out Richard Swinburne on eBay. Looking for Richard Swinburne? We have almost everything on eBay.

Search results

  1. Richard Granville Swinburne (IPA / ˈ s w ɪ n b ɜːr n /) FBA (born 26 December 1934) is an English philosopher. He is an Emeritus Professor of Philosophy at the University of Oxford. Over the last 50 years, Swinburne has been a proponent of philosophical arguments for the existence of God.

  2. Learn about the life and achievements of Richard Swinburne, a prominent philosopher of religion and theism. He is known for his arguments for the existence of God, the Resurrection of Jesus, and the nature of the soul and free will.

  3. Richard Swinburne is one of the best-known names in the international philosophical scene. His apologetic project is considered one of the largest and most impactful and profound of the last century.

  4. A comprehensive list of books and articles by Richard Swinburne, a leading philosopher of religion and metaphysics. The publications cover topics such as the existence of God, the philosophy of theism, the Christian doctrine, and the philosophy of mind.

  5. Mar 30, 2017 · Professor Richard Swinburne (University of Oxford) speaks at the Philosophy Society Lecture Series, 10th March 2016.

    • 48 min
    • 50.9K
    • Philosophy at the University of Edinburgh
  6. Apr 20, 2009 · This chapter presents the biography and principal theological arguments of Richard Granville Swinburne. Swinburne is a British philosopher who has pioneered the use of Bayesian probability calculus in the philosophy of religion; undertaken rigorous philosophical analyses and, on occasion, reconstructions of the central doctrines of Christianity;

  7. Richard Swinburne [Swinburne, Richard, "How to determine which is the true theory of Personal Identity" in (ed.) G.Gasser and M.Stefan, Personal Identity - Complex or Simple?, Cambridge University Press, 2012.] I. The Problem The simple view of diachronic personal identity holds that personal