Inge Brunner
Search results
71 Fragments of a Chronology of Chance (German: 71 Fragmente einer Chronologie des Zufalls) is a 1994 drama film written and directed by Michael Haneke. [1] It has a fragmented storyline as the title suggests, and chronicles several seemingly unrelated stories in parallel, but these separate narrative lines intersect in an incident at the end of the film.
Oct 26, 1995 · 71 Fragments of a Chronology of Chance: Directed by Michael Haneke. With Gabriel Cosmin Urdes, Lukas Miko, Otto Grünmandl, Anne Bennent. 71 scenes revolving around a recent immigrant, a couple that has just adopted a daughter, a college student and a lonely old man.
- (8.9K)
- Drama
- Michael Haneke
A film by Michael Haneke that explores the random and interconnected nature of modern existence through 71 intricate scenes. The film follows the stories of various characters, including a Romanian boy, a couple, and a student, who collide in a violent encounter at a bank.
- Romanian Boy
Rated: 3/4 • Mar 27, 2023. A panel in Michael Haneke's trilogy about gratuitous acts of vioelnce and their devastating effects. Rated: B • Aug 1, 2011. Page 1 of 3, 6 total items. With 71 ...
- (6)
- Gabriel Cosmin Urdes
- Michael Haneke
- Drama
Jul 14, 2006 · Consider the word chance in the title of Michael Haneke’s 1994 feature “71 Fragments of a Chronology of Chance.” An icy-cool study of violence both mediated and horribly real, the film ...
- Michael Haneke
A 1994 film by Michael Haneke that depicts the random and interconnected nature of modern existence. The film follows the stories of several characters who are affected by a violent encounter at a bank in Vienna.
People also ask
How many fragments of a chronology of chance are there?
What is 71 Fragments of a chronology of Chance about?
When was 71 Fragments of a chronology of Chance released in India?
How many fragments of a chronology of Chance does Michael Haneke have?
Oct 26, 2005 · The trilogy's conclusion, 71 Fragments, doesn't quite fit the glaciation theme, but it does show Haneke's willingness to experiment with the form and challenge the way audiences receive information. The film's radical deconstruction of various narrative strands questions the way such information is delivered and received.
