Yahoo India Web Search

Search results

  1. This book, which marks the one hundredth anniversary of The Terry Lecture Series, offers a unique perspective for anyone interested in the debate between science and religion in America. 978-0-300-16500-5. Religion. JSTOR is a digital library of academic journals, books, and primary sources.

  2. Eighty-one years after America witnessed the Scopes trial over the teaching of evolution in public schools, the debate between science and religion continues. In this book scholars from a variety of disciplines-sociology, history, science, and theology-provide new insights into the contemporary dialogue as well as some perspective suggestions ...

    • Harold W. Attridge, Keith Thomson, Ronald L. Numbers, Kenneth R. Miller, Alvin Plantinga, Lawrence M...
    • 9780.3B
    • 2009
    • 232
  3. Sep 1, 2009 · Why does the tension between science and religion continue? How have those tensions changed during the past one hundred years? How have those tensions impacted the public debate about so-called...

    • Ronald L. Numbers
    • 207
    • 211
    • 179
  4. May 12, 2021 · The religion and science debate : why does it continue? Publication date. 2009. Topics. Religion and science. Publisher. New Haven : Yale University Press. Collection. internetarchivebooks; printdisabled.

  5. In this book scholars from a variety of disciplines—sociology, history, science, and theology—provide new insights into the contemporary dialogue as well as some perspective suggestions for...

  6. Sep 1, 2009 · The Religion and Science Debate. Why Does It Continue? Edited by Harold W. Attridge. Introduction by Keith Stewart Thomson. Contributions by Ronald L. Numbers, Kenneth R. Miller, Lawrence M. Krauss, Robert Wuthnow and Alvin Plantinga. Series: The Terry Lectures Series. 240 Pages, 5.50 x 8.25 x 0.50 in, 4 b-w illus. Paperback. 9780300152999.

  7. Sep 1, 2009 · Why does the tension between science and religion continue? How have those tensions changed during the past one hundred years? How have those tensions impacted the public debate about so-called “intelligent design” as a scientific alternative to evolution?