Yahoo India Web Search

Search results

  1. View Debidutta Mohantys profile on LinkedIn, a professional community of 1 billion members. No-Ops Infrastructure Developer at Barclays | BI Consultant · Experience: Barclays UK · Location:...

    • No-Ops Infrastructure Developer-AVP
    • United Kingdom
    • Barclays UK
  2. View Debidutta Mohanty’s profile on LinkedIn, a professional community of 1 billion members. Investor | Trader | Technical analysis | Stock Market | Portfolio | Finance |...

    • Audit Analyst
    • January 1, 2023
    • Deloitte
    • Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
    • Subject
    • Important Provisions
    • Brief Facts
    • Questions Raised
    • Arguments Advanced by The Appellant
    • Arguments Advanced by The Respondent
    • Analysis by The Court
    • Conclusion

    The Hon’ble Supreme Court (hereinafter referred to as ‘Supreme Court’ or ‘the Court’), held that according to a ruling, the Collector has the power to revoke a license document for failure to produce a viability certificate under Rule 51(7) of the Orissa Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2016.

    Orissa Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 2016

    1. Rule 51(7) – states that the Collector has the power to revoke a contract document for failure to produce a solvency certificate.

    The auction notification for the rental agreement of a sand sairat was released on January 8, 2018.
    The buyer was required to provide a solvency document to the Revenue Officer in accordance with Clause 5 of the auction notification, with an offered sum that could be equal to the royalty and extr...
    The solvency certificate was given in favor of Pattanaik (Chairman of Trust) in his private role rather than "Gurukrupa Charitable Trust, Chairman of Village Kendupali," which was against the Sub-C...
    Pattanaik had been the second bidder, however, as the bidder with the highest price was discovered to be in default, a note regarding his readiness to begin operations at the highest bidder's rate...
    Who is the competent authority to issue the order of cancellation of the solvency certificate?
    Whether the solvency certificate needed to be issued in favour of the trust or the chairmen of the trust?
    It has been argued that given the relevant facts and circumstances, the Division Bench of the High Court erred significantly in quashing and setting aside the Collector's order by cancelling the co...
    The observations made by the high court were of material blunder regarding the initial subject matter of solvency certificate. This certificate was in the ownership of charitable trust however that...
    As the property mentioned was not in the possession of the respondent, therefore the solvency certificate use would be amounting to fraud resulting his bid as non-est and void ab initio.
    The council argued that the court ignored that the case was modus operandi with the attempt to transfer the property to the trust. Also, the respondent was disqualified by the Tehsildar and the Sub...
    It is submitted by the council that the High Court has not committed a blunder in analysing that the solvency certificate in the name of the chairman of the trust instead of the trust was a mere mi...
    Here the council only made the application for the correction of the certificate, where the fresh certificate was in the favour of respondent. Therefore appellant cannot state the bid as void ab in...
    It is to be noted that Tehsildar is the competent authority for issuing the cancellation certificate is required under Rule 51(7) of OMMC Rules 2016. However here the cancelation order was given by...
    In addition to the lease term expiring during the pendency of the current processes, a new lease deed was also performed later in accordance with the impugned ruling rendered by the High Court.
    The Supreme Court observed that according to Rule 51(7), the Tehsildar is only authorized to revoke tenancy agreements when those agreements' terms have been broken.
    The issuance of an unlawful solvency certificate at the point when the offer was submitted in the current instance constituted the violation of the deed's condition instead. It believed that Rule 5...
    Additionally, it pointed out that the Collector's decision to revoke the deed was made in accordance with a High Court ruling instructing it to make a decision regarding Mohanty's representative.
    The Apex Court added that it could not be said that the Tehsildar made an error when he granted the certificate in Pattanaik's name despite receiving clear directions from the Sub-Collector that it...

    In the above case it was pointed out by the council of the party that solvency document that was present at the time of the offer, not a later one, was what had to be taken into account. Upon this argument the High Court made few observations stating that according to Rule 51(7) of the Rules, 2016, the Tehsildar is the authorized authority to revok...

  3. Mar 3, 2023 · Supreme Court of India. Debidutta Mohanty vs Ranjan Kumar Pattnaik on 3 March, 2023. Author: M. R. Shah. Bench: B.V. Nagarathna, M. R. Shah. 1. REPORTABLE. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA. CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4939 of 2022.

  4. writer, producer. biography, photo, best movies and TV shows, news, birthday and age. «Pushkara» (2023), «Astika Nastika» (2022), «Ea Bi Gote Love Story» (2021), «Chorani» (2021), «Bapa ICU Re Achhanti» (2021)...

    • Male
    • Writer, Producer
  5. About. • Customer-focused professional with successful 12-year career in E-Governance & Telecom sector. • Highly committed with hardworking mentality to maintain quality of...

  6. Debidutta Mohanty is known as an Lyricist, Screenplay, Executive Producer, Story, and Dialogue. Some of their work includes To Pain Pheribi Rahila Rana, Break Up Bala Love Story, Mukha, Pushkara, Tinga Raju, Bichha Gang, Bohu Ama Bichhuati, and Priyara Pre-wedding Love Story.