Yahoo India Web Search

Search results

  1. 8 hours ago · 27 May 2024: KAL Airways and Kalanithi Maran have announced their intention to pursue damages exceeding Rs 1,323 crore from SpiceJet and its CEO Ajay Singh. 17 May 2024: The Division Bench of the Delhi High Court overturned a single-judge order directing SpiceJet to reimburse over Rs270 crore to Kalanithi Maran, the promoter of Sun Group.

  2. 2 hours ago · On May 28, SpiceJet vehemently denied the claims made by KAL Airways and Kalanithi Maran, who are seeking damages amounting to Rs. 1,323 crore. In a press statement, SpiceJet said, “…strongly refutes the claims made by KAL Airways and Kalanithi Maran regarding seeking damages of Rs.1323 crore ...

  3. 12 hours ago · In an escalation of the ongoing dispute, SpiceJet on May 28 said the claims made by KAL Airways and Kalanithi Maran for more than ₹1,323 crore in damages are baseless and legally untenable. On ...

  4. People also ask

  5. 14 hours ago · Crisis-hit SpiceJet Tuesday rejected the claims made by KAL Airways and Kalanithi Maran, seeking damages of Rs 1,323 crore from SpiceJet and its chief Ajay Singh in the ongoing dispute between the two sides. A division bench of the Delhi High Court on May 17, had set aside a single-judge bench order ...

  6. 12 hours ago · SpiceJet has rejected the claims made by KAL Airways and Kalanithi Maran, who have demanded damages of Rs 13.23 billion, reported news agency Reuters. The airline described the claims as "baseless" and stated that the matter lacks merit. SpiceJet believes this is an attempt to sensationalise the issue and mislead the public.

  7. 15 hours ago · Following this, KAL Airways and Kalanithi Maran appealed to the Single-Judge Bench of the Delhi High Court, seeking the same amount in damages, which was again rejected by the court. Notably ...

  8. 15 hours ago · SpiceJet refuted the Rs 1,323 crore damages sought by Kalanithi Maran and KAL Airways as legally untenable. Maran and KAL plan to challenge a Delhi High Court order that remanded the dispute, involving a Rs 579 crore refund, for reconsideration. The Delhi high court had overturned a previous ruling favoring Maran.

  1. People also search for