Yahoo India Web Search

Search results

  1. Dictionary
    admissible
    /ədˈmɪsɪbl/

    adjective

    • 1. acceptable or valid, especially as evidence in a court of law: "the tape recording was admissible as evidence"
    • 2. having the right to be admitted to a place: "foreigners were admissible only as temporary workers"

    More definitions, origin and scrabble points

  2. 4. An admissible heuristic is simply one that, as you said, does not overestimate the distance to a goal. It is allowed to underestimate, and the two examples you gave are indeed valid, admissible heuristics. Typically in the kinds of algorithms we're talking about with these heuristics (for instance, A*), it is beneficial if the heuristics are ...

  3. Dec 11, 2013 · 3. It is best to think of a consistent heuristic as an admissible heuristic which obeys the triangle inequality: Cost(a -> c) <= Cost(a -> b) + Cost(b -> c) for any three nodes a, b and c in the search space, with the understanding that the cost is computed using the actual cost between adjacent nodes and using the heuristic otherwise.

  4. Nov 14, 2017 · If you can formally define the real distance from the goal, then you can simply eliminate a constraint in order to develop an admissible heuristic. For example: The Manhattan distance from point (x1, y1) to point (x2,y2) is equal to |x1-x2|+|y1-y2|. You can simply eliminate a term to come up with a heuristic. For example h = |x1-x2|.

  5. Feb 6, 2016 · An admissible heuristic is one that never overestimates the cost of the minimum cost path from a node to the goal node. So, a heuristic is specific to a particular state space, and also to a particular goal state in that state space. It must be admissible for all states in that search space. To help remember whether it is “never overestimates ...

  6. Oct 2, 2015 · Admissibility; if you want your heuristics to be admissible then you should have that h(n) <=h*(n) for every node n where h* is the real cost to the goal.

  7. May 24, 2016 · Breadth first search is admissible, because it looks at every state at level n before considering any state at level n+1. Monotonicity : This property asks if an algorithm is locally admissible---that is, it always underestimates the cost between any two states in the search space. Recall that A* does not require that g(n) = g*(n).

  8. Oct 13, 2014 · 1. @belisarius: An "admissible heuristic" in A* search is an estimate of how close you are to your goal that never overstates the distance. That guarantees finding the shortest (or least-cost) path. This is a real question, although one requiring the knowledge of some specific terminology, and should be re-opened.

  9. Oct 29, 2020 · 3. I was trying to prove that consistent heuristic implies the admissible condition. one of the proofs that I read was mentioned here: let h (n) be the heuristic value at node n and c (n,n+1) the cost from node n to node n+1. we are given the assumption that h (ng)=0; where ng is the goal node. Informally, we want to backtrack from the goal ...

  10. Overestimating doesn't exactly make the algorithm "incorrect"; what it means is that you no longer have an admissible heuristic, which is a condition for A* to be guaranteed to produce optimal behavior. With an inadmissible heuristic, the algorithm can wind up doing tons of superfluous work. as @AlbertoPL is hinting.

  11. Dec 23, 2013 · This would be equivalent to Dijkstra's algorithm. h (n) = t (n) / 2: Admissible since the expected cost is lower than the true cost. Consistent since the cost of a move will always be at least double the expected cost of that move (it will also increase h (n) if moving away from the goal), thus any move will increase the total expected cost.