Search results
The Logic of Scientific Discovery is a 1959 book about the philosophy of science by the philosopher Karl Popper. Popper rewrote his book in English from the 1934 (imprint '1935') German original, titled Logik der Forschung.
May 14, 2021 · It presents succinctly Popper's view of science and his solutions to two fundamental problems of the theory of knowledge: the demarcation of science from non-science, and the role of induction in the growth of scientific knowledge
There is nothing more necessary to the man of science than its history, and the logic of discovery . . . : the way error is detected, the use of hypothesis, of imagination, the mode of testing.
Feb 20, 2002 · Described by the philosopher A.J. Ayer as a work of 'great originality and power', this book revolutionized contemporary thinking on science and knowledge.
The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Karl Popper. Routledge, Nov 4, 2005 - Philosophy - 544 pages. Described by the philosopher A.J. Ayer as a work of 'great originality and power', this book...
The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Karl Raimund Popper. Psychology Press, 2002 - Philosophy - 479 pages. Described by the philosopher A.J. Ayer as a work of 'great originality and power', this...
The Logic of Scientific Discovery. By Karl Popper, Karl Popper Copyright 2002. 544 Pages. by Routledge. Description. Described by the philosopher A.J. Ayer as a work of 'great originality and power', this book revolutionized contemporary thinking on science and knowledge.
The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Karl R. Popper, Karl Raimund Popper. Psychology Press, 2002 - Philosophy - 513 pages. Described by the philosopher A.J. Ayer as a work of 'great originality and...
The logic of scientific discovery. Basic Books. Abstract. This treatise on scientific theories and methods is a translation by its author of the 1934 Viennese edition, with considerable rearrangement and the addition of numerous appendices and notes.
Jul 10, 2024 · Some of the ideas that Karl Popper set out in his Logic of Scientific Discovery may be familiar to those with an interest in philosophy. Thus, people may readily identify him with the idea of falsifiability as the mark of science and of the fallibility of even our best scientific knowledge.
