Search results
May 5, 2023 · Kharak Singh was released from an investigation of dacoity due to lack of evidence against him, but the U.P. Police opened a “history sheet” against him under Chapter 20 of the U.P. Police Regulations, which allowed for surveillance on individuals who were habitual criminals or were considered likely to become habitual criminals.
Apex courts should at least endeavor to highlight as many as possible, controversial issues, building an arbitrary attitude among a particular section of society to avoid injustice and to drive the minds out of the shackles of backwardness. End-Notes: Kharak Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh AIR 1963 SC 1295.
Sep 26, 2021 · The petitioner, Kharak Singh was known to the Police as a person who was involved in armed robberies, he was charged with the same in one such case wherein he has charged or been part of an armed gang in 1941; but due to the paucity of evidence to prove a case against him, he was acquitted by the court of law.
http://judis.nic.in supreme court of india page 1 of 19 petitioner: kharak singh vs. respondent: the state of u. p. & others date of judgment: 18/12/1962
Facts. The petitioner, Kharak Singh, had been charged with violent robbery as part of an armed gang in 1941. He was released due to lack of evidence, but a ‘history sheet’ was opened in regard to him under the Uttar Pradesh Police Regulations. These regulations provided for surveillance powers, including powers of domiciliary visits, for ...
Apr 18, 2022 · State of U.P | 1964 SCR (1) 332 by Vidhi Agrawal. Facts. The Petitioner, Kharak Singh, was discharged from a dacoity inquiry due to a lack of evidence, but the Uttar Pradesh Police Department opened a 'history sheet' against him under Chapter 20 of the Uttar Pradesh Police Regulations. Individuals who were habitual criminals or were suspected ...
Jan 28, 2024 · Kharak Singh was earlier put on trial in 1941 for allegedly being part of an armed robbery but was released due to a lack of evidence under Section 169 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The U.P. Police also opened a “history sheet” defined under Section 228 of the U.P. Police Regulations for the petitioner, classifying him under Class A of criminals under surveillance.
